Begin with a researchable question
Narrow the topic to a decision or specific uncertainty. “What changed?” and “Which primary source defines this requirement?” produce a more useful search than a broad request for everything about a subject.
A source-checking workflow
- Read the answer once to identify names, claims and possible primary sources.
- Open each relevant link instead of relying on the displayed snippet.
- Find the exact passage that supports or challenges the claim.
- Check publication or update dates and whether the guidance applies to your country and situation.
- Write your own synthesis and retain links to the sources you actually read.
Citation checks that catch problems
- Relevance: does the page discuss the same claim, or only a related topic?
- Authority: is it a primary source, independent reporting or promotional commentary?
- Context: did the answer omit exceptions, qualifications or an opposing finding?
- Accuracy: do names, numbers and quotations match the page exactly?
- Coverage: what important source or perspective is still missing?
Know when to stop
If the original source is unavailable, behind an access barrier or unclear, mark the claim as unverified. Do not replace missing evidence with a confident sentence. For consequential decisions, consult the responsible professional or official body.
Official and reference links